FBI Raid on John Bolton’s Home: iPhones, Documents, and USB Drives Seized in Surprise Search

In a surprising development, federal agents conducted a raid on the home of John Bolton, former national security adviser to President Donald Trump, last month. According to newly released court documents made public on Thursday, September 4, 2025, the FBI seized a variety of items during the operation, including electronic devices and documents potentially related to classified information and national security matters. The raid, which caught Bolton unaware, has raised questions about the nature of the investigation and the materials in his possession, though no charges have been filed against him at this time. The court filings provide a detailed inventory of the items taken from Bolton’s residence. Among the seized items are two iPhones—one red with two camera lenses and one black in a black case—as well as multiple USB drives, including two SanDisk 64 GB drives. Federal agents also confiscated several computers, including a Dell Precision Tower 3620, a silver Dell XPS laptop with cables, and a silver Dell Inspiron 2330. Additionally, a Seagate hard drive was taken during the search. Beyond electronics, the inventory lists physical documents and records, including a white binder labeled ‘Statements and Reflections to Allied Strikes…’, typed documents in folders labeled ‘Trump I-IV’, and four boxes containing printed daily activities. These items suggest a focus on materials related to Bolton’s tenure as national security adviser from April 2018 to September 2019. The basis for the raid, as outlined in the court documents, centers on the search for 'evidence of a crime,' 'contraband, fruits of crime, or other items illegally possessed,' and 'property designed for use, intended for use, or used in committing a crime.' Specifically, federal agents were authorized to seize physical documents and records, with or without classification markings, that appear to be classified and relate to Bolton’s former role as assistant to the president for National Security Affairs. The scope of the search also extended to any information or communications— in any form—concerning the retrieval, storage, or transmission of classified material or national defense information. Furthermore, agents were instructed to take devices that could have been used to store or transmit such sensitive data. The government’s motion underscored the need for secrecy in executing the raid. According to the filings, Bolton was unaware of the ongoing investigation prior to the search. Federal authorities expressed concern that if Bolton were to become aware of the probe, he might 'flee or take steps to destroy or conceal the evidence sought pursuant thereto.' This statement highlights the sensitive nature of the materials under scrutiny and the potential risks associated with their mishandling or unauthorized disclosure. The emphasis on classified information also points to broader concerns within the federal government about the security of national defense data, particularly in the hands of former high-ranking officials. John Bolton, a prominent figure in U.S. foreign policy circles, served as national security adviser during a tumultuous period in the Trump administration. Known for his hawkish views on international affairs, Bolton was involved in key decisions related to national security and foreign policy before his departure from the role in 2019. His tenure was marked by public disagreements with Trump, culminating in his exit from the administration. Since then, Bolton has been a vocal critic of the former president, including through the publication of a memoir, 'The Room Where It Happened,' which detailed his experiences in the White House and raised concerns about Trump’s handling of classified information and decision-making processes. While the court documents do not specify the exact nature of the current investigation, the focus on classified materials and communications related to national defense suggests a possible connection to Bolton’s time in office or his subsequent activities. The raid on Bolton’s home is part of a broader pattern of federal investigations into the handling of classified information by former government officials. In recent years, several high-profile figures have faced scrutiny over their possession of sensitive documents after leaving office. The legal and ethical implications of such cases are significant, as the unauthorized retention or disclosure of classified information can pose risks to national security. The court filings in Bolton’s case do not indicate whether the seized materials contain confirmed classified information or if they were improperly stored, but the authorization to seize items with classification markings suggests that this is a central focus of the investigation. At this stage, Bolton has not been charged with any crimes, and it remains unclear whether the seized items will lead to formal accusations. The lack of charges does not diminish the seriousness of the raid, however, as the government’s actions indicate a belief that evidence of potential wrongdoing may exist. Legal experts note that investigations of this nature often take time to unfold, particularly when dealing with sensitive national security matters. The outcome of this probe could have significant implications for Bolton, as well as for broader discussions about accountability and the handling of classified information by former officials. The raid also raises questions about the intersection of technology and national security. The seizure of multiple electronic devices, including iPhones, USB drives, and computers, underscores the role that digital tools play in storing and transmitting sensitive information. In an era where data breaches and cyber threats are constant concerns, the security of electronic devices used by government officials—past and present—is a critical issue. The investigation into Bolton’s possessions may shed light on how such devices are managed after an official leaves office and whether adequate safeguards are in place to prevent unauthorized access to classified data. As the investigation continues, the public and legal community will be watching closely for further developments. The court documents released thus far provide only a glimpse into the scope and purpose of the raid, leaving many questions unanswered. What specific evidence prompted the search? Do the seized materials contain classified information, and if so, how did they come into Bolton’s possession after his departure from the White House? These are among the issues that federal authorities will likely address in the coming weeks and months. For now, the raid on John Bolton’s home serves as a stark reminder of the enduring responsibilities that come with handling classified information. It also highlights the government’s commitment to safeguarding national security, even when it involves scrutinizing the actions of former high-ranking officials. As more information emerges, this case may contribute to ongoing debates about transparency, accountability, and the protection of sensitive data in the digital age.